
U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney confers with Turkish Prime Minister
Bulent Ecevit at his official residence in Ankara, Turkey, Tuesday,
March 19, 2002. Turkey, a key ally, is the final stop of Cheney's
10-day, 12-country tour of Arab states and Israel to build support
for President Bush's war on terrorism. |
U.S.
Offers Aid to Turkey to Lead Kabul Peace Force
$228 million promised during VP Cheney's Ankara visit
MICHAEL
R. GORDON New York Times, ANKARA, Turkey, March
19
- The United States has offered Turkey $228 million in aid to seal its
agreement to assume command of the international peacekeeping force in
Kabul, the Afghan capital, American and Turkish officials said today.
After meeting
with Vice President Dick Cheney tonight, Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit
said the Bush administration had promised the funds to defray Turkey's
expenses in Afghanistan and would formally seek approval from Congress
this week.
Under the
new arrangement, Turkey would lead the force while a German colonel would
assume the second level of command. Mr. Ecevit said he was hopeful that
the remaining details would be worked out.
The offer
of American assistance follows weeks of quiet negotiations among American,
British and Turkish officials over the future of the peacekeeping mission
in the Afghan capital.
Britain now
commands the peacekeeping force of nearly 5,000 in Kabul. The purpose
of the force is to stabilize the capital and support the interim Afghan
government of Hamid Karzai.
Before the
international force moved into the capital, security was provided by the
Northern Alliance, which is one faction in the transitional government.
Britain
has been eager to hand over responsibility for the force. The United States,
which has declined to dispatch peacekeeping troops, had no interest in
the command. As a Muslim nation, Turkey was a logical candidate. American
and British officials lobbied Turkey to accept the mission.
Turkey had
several concerns, and money was just one of them. It was also concerned
about the scope of the mission, the specific nature of its responsibilities
in Kabul, the type of equipment that would be made available and the duration
of the mission.
The United
States offered the financial aid to ease those concerns. An American official
confirmed that the funds consist of $28 million in direct aid and $200
million in debt relief.
The Turks
have also been assured that their mission will be a narrow one: the force
they will command will be used only in and around the Afghan capital.
Plans to expand the force throughout the country have been put aside.
Mr. Cheney
also offered other gestures of support. He reiterated American backing
for Turkey's admission to the European Union, affirmed Turkey's importance
and emphasized the contribution Turkey's forces could make to stabilizing
the situation in Afghanistan.
In his evening
meeting with Mr. Ecevit, Mr. Cheney also discussed Iraq, the problems
of weapons of mass destruction and the recent diplomatic moves in the
Middle East.
Turkey has
warned against a military campaign to topple the Iraqi president, Saddam
Hussein. The Turkish concern is that his overthrow might lead to the breakup
of Iraq and, in particular, an independent Kurdistan. That, Turkey fears,
might prompt Kurds in Turkey to seek a country of their own. Turkish officials
also say the Persian Gulf war of 1991 cost Turkey many billions of dollars
in lost trade and other revenue. But Turkey would be important base of
operations for an American military campaign against Iraq. The United
States used air bases in Turkey to fight the gulf war and now uses them
to carry out air patrols of the no-flight zone over northern Iraq.
Many analysts
predict that Turkey would acquiescence in an American campaign against
Iraq, but not without considerable incentives and persuading. In the meantime,
Turkey's leaders reassured their public that war was not at hand.
"Cheney underlined
that there will not be an operation against Iraq in the near future,"
Mr. Ecevit said.
Swedish
Parliament: "We Cant Say there was Armenian genocide"
Swedes agree with Turks and confess that 2000 decision was a mistake
Serkan
Demirtas, Cumhuriyet (Turkey), March 27, 2002 - Swedish Parliament
has announced that its recognition of the "Armenian genocide"
in the year 2000 on the basis of "United Nations resolutions"
was a mistake since the U.N. has never recognized the "Armenian genocide."
The Swedish
Parliament said it will not reach a decision on the alleged Armenian,
Assyrian and Keldani "genocides" that were allegedly committed
before 1948, and that such claims are better studied by historians. The
Parliament has also admitted that it made a mistake back in 2000 by recognizing
the "Armenian genocide" on the basis of United Nations resolutions,
since the U.N. has never confirmed any such genocide. Swedish Parliament
gave full support to the Turkish thesis that the terms of the 1948 U.N.
Genocide Convention cannot be projected back to events that took place
before that year. However, the Parliament also noted that Turkey did not
take the sufficient positive steps in human rights and is still far away
from satisfying the "Copenhagen criteria."
Murad Artin,
the leftist member of Swedish parliaments Foreign Affairs Commission,
submitted a proposal to the Commission, urging for the General Assembly
to vote and recognize the Assyrian, Armenian, and Keldani "genocides"
perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire during First World War.
The Swedish
Foreign Affairs Commission in a report it issued stated the following
[translated by Turkish Times from the Turkish news story]:
-- There
is no official Swedish position that characterizes the events that took
place during the Ottoman Empire as a "genocide"...
-- The Commission while discussing the motion 1999/2000:U651 has referred
to a 1985 U.N. resolution. Further research has revealed that there does
not exist any U.N. resolutions that address the Armenians, neither in
1985 nor in any other time. The situation of the Assyrians and Keldanis
are the same. Therefore the Commission should never have formulated the
statements pertaining the "Armenian genocide" in those terms.
-- The Commission believes in the importance of discussing the massacres
suffered by Armenians, Assyriand and Keldanis. For this purpose there
needs to be open and unconditional historical research.
-- The status of human rights and democracy in Turkey today is not satisfactory.
Turkey does not satisfy the "Copenhagen criteria" necessary
to secure full membership [in the EU]. According to some observers, there
are signs that human rights situation is deteriorating for some groups
in Turkey.
Amb.
Logoglu Visits Boston
Erkut
Gomulu, ATAA VP New England-The Turkish American Cultural Society
of New England (TACS) was honored to host Ambassador O. Faruk Logoglu
and Mrs. Mevhibe Logoglu between March 14 - March 16 who made their first
visit to Boston. Ambassador Logoglu's intense program in Boston consisted
of meetings with the prominent academicians and scientists in the area
universities, businessmen and members of the Turkish American community.
Ambassador Logoglu also visited Harvard University Center for Middle Eastern
Studies and gave a lecture entitled "Turkey in the 21st Century" at Fletcher
School of Law and Diplomacy.
Ambassador
Logoglu's program in Boston included the New England premiere of the documentary,
"Desperate Hours" at Brandeis University, and the concert by PALS Children's
Chorus, "Tales from the Silk Road", featuring the world premiere of Mehmet
Ali Sanlikol's composition, "Ergenekon: An Ancient Turkish Legend" at
New England Conservatory.
ATAA/TACS
Grassroots & Leadership Conference: "Making Connections and Building
Bridges" also took place for the first time in Boston, on March 16, during
the visit of Ambassador Logoglu.
In honor
of Ambassador Faruk Logoglu and Mrs. Mevhibe Logoglu's visit to Boston,
and on the occasion of the ATAA/TACS Grassroots & Leadership Conference,
ATAA and TACS-New England organized a dinner reception on Friday, March
15 at Boston's elegant Marriott Hotel at Copley Place. Opening remarks
of the dinner were presented by Erkut Gömülü, President
of TACS-New England and Vice President - Northeastern Region of ATAA;
Dr. Orhan Kaymakçalan, President of ATAA; and Ambassador Faruk
Logoglu. Also representing ATAA at the dinner were Güler Köknar,
Executive Director, Vural Cengiz, Treasurer, and Osman Tat, Assistant
Director of Public Affairs.
Enchanting
music of Guitar Duo: Bilgehan Tuncer and Devrim Eldelekli, local and talented
musicians from Berklee College of Music captured the guests and Collage
Dance Ensemble performed a two-parts dazzling dance show. First part entitled
"Breaking the Rules: Anarchy in Social Dance" featuring The Original Can-Can
and Rock and Roll, Jitterbug and Bop, which were all unconventional dance
styles took place in different eras of history, created by teenagers seeing
dance as a resistance against authority. The second part of Collage's
show, "Eastern Tides", has won the best choreography award of Boston Moves
2001 by Ahmet Lüleci's choreography, who is also the founder and
artistic director of Collage Dance Ensemble. Mr. Lüleci's unique
choreography reflects traditional dance movements of Turkey, including
Zeybek and Blacksea dances, and dance movements of Eastern European countries
such as Hungary, Georgia and Azerbaijan.
The well
attended night gave the opportunity to the Turkish American community
in the region to meet with Ambassador and Mrs. Logoglu, ATAA President
Dr. Kaymakçalan and other ATAA representatives.
Amb.
Logoglu Lectures at Fletcher School
Erkut
Gomulu, ATAA VP New England-On Thursday, March 14, Ambassador
Faruk Logoglu delivered a lecture entitled "Turkey in the 21st Century"
at Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy of Tufts University. The lecture,
organized by The Program in Southwest Asia and Turkish Studies at Fletcher
School of Law & Diplomacy and the Turkish American Cultural Society
of New England (TACS), was covered in The Fletcher School News by the
following article: "Turkey is definitely in a tough neighborhood"
Turkish
Ambassador to US speaks at Fletcher
Ben
Ball, Office of Public Affairs-As the war in Afghanistan continues
with its various twists and turns, Turkey, an important US ally, is pledged
to continue to play "the lead role," according to the Turkish Ambassador
to the United States.
Speaking
to Fletcher students on Mar. 14, Amb. Osman Faruk Logoglu said: "We are
at the forefront of the war, as a friend, as an ally, and in reciprocation
for the United States' understanding of our own fight against terrorism."
Turkey, which
currently has some 270 troops in Afghanistan, is negotiating with the
United States and the United Kingdom to take over command of the International
Security Assistance Force (ISAF) based in Kabul. Logoglu stated that under
Turkish command, that force could grow to 4,500 troops from over 10 countries.
Referring
to the mandate of that force, Logoglu said "the general preference is
for a force that is limited to Kabul. My feeling, however, is that Afghanistan
is a whole country. If you are going to do a good job, you need a large
force -- 25,000 at least."
Logoglu told
his audience that a Turkish-led ISAF would help to ensure peace on the
ground while rebuilding the country. "Turkey is eminently poised to prepare
an army for Afghanistan, to build agriculture in Afghanistan. These are
areas in which we can play a significant role," he said.
No stranger
to peacekeeping operations, Turkish generals previously led the UN force
in Somalia. Logoglu stressed the importance of a Muslim country to take
a leadership role in Afghanistan as a symbolic gesture to that largely
traditional society.
"Turkey has
an excellent resonance with the people of Afghanistan," he said. "Turkey
is a country where democracy, Islam, and secularism coexist."
Still, the
Turkish Ambassador admitted that Turkey's role in the war on terror does
not have unanimous domestic support. "There are people in Turkey who oppose
sending troops, but the majority decided to do it. This was decided by
the parliament," he said.
Logoglu also
addressed the difficulties Turkey must face as a front-line state in the
war on terror. "Turkey is definitely in a tough neighborhood," he cautioned.
"There is not one conflict in the world today which is not in Turkey's
vicinity. Turkey is at the epicenter of all these conflicts. We will have
to resolve our issues with our neighbors in spite of our neighbors."
One of those
difficult neighbors is Iraq, which Logoglu warned is a sensitive issue
for the region. He said that US intervention in Iraq would "cause the
region to experience a lot of difficulties. This will upset the balance
of all Iraq's neighbors. In a larger economic and political sense, this
could be a major problem for the region."
Logoglu told
his audience that "there is still time" to coerce the Iraqi regime into
accepting UN-mandated weapons inspectors. "If that doesn't happen, what
will occur? I cannot say at this moment. It will depend upon [Vice President]
Cheney's visit," Logoglu said.
Turkish
customs chief says he is battling corruption
Orhan Coskun, ANKARA, March 15 (Reuters)
- The chief of the Turkish customs office said on Friday he was striving
to erase the image of a service so tainted by corruption and bribery that
it deters crucial foreign investment in Turkey. Turkish officials and
the World Bank both acknowledge that a widespread impression of entrenched
corruption deters many foreign investors from doing business in Turkey,
where foreign cash is particularly needed after a damaging financial crisis.
"As customs
officials, we want to remove the stains, we want to be cleared," Customs
Undersecretary Nevzat Saygilioglu told Reuters in an interview.
There are
tales of corruption affecting many state bodies in Turkey, but stories
of the bribes needed to expedite passage of crucial shipments through
customs are the most urgent concern for many businessmen. As part of its
pledges to the International Monetary Fund in return for a $16 billion
loan package, Turkey has promised to make the country more attractive
for foreign investment.
Saygilioglu,
a career bureaucrat and at the customs authority for over a year, acknowledges
that his department is flawed but denies any systematic corruption.
"There is
nothing organized, whether in the center or the provinces, with people
inside or outside. What happens is individual behavior," he said.
A recent
survey of customs officials showed that around 40 percent of employees
said there was corruption of some type in their organization. Changes
to working practices, a new ethics code, police investigations and education
campaigns were all working to eradicate a culture of corruption and bribery,
Saygilioglu said.
"Where there
is bureaucracy there is bribery. People feel obliged to give something
in order to complete legal work. We have reduced this a lot. Automation
is one of the important methods," he said.
He said police
investigations were under way in many cases. "There are a range of operations
in the customs under different names. The people concerned will either
be exposed or fired from public service, depending on what the judges
and prosecutors decide," he said.
Turkey is
struggling to recover from a financial crisis last year that sparked the
deepest recession since 1945 and cost hundreds of thousands of jobs.
Kenan
Evren Chair Inaugurated in FAU
The Turkish Times with wire services-Florida Atlantic University
(FAU) inaugurated the "Kenan Evren Eminent Scholar Chair in Turkish Studies"
at a ceremony held in Boca Raton and attended by ATAA President Dr.Orhan
Kaymakcalan, Treasurer Vural Cengiz and Southeastern Region Vice President
Guney Adak together with other members of the area Turkish American community.
The endowment
of the Chair was spearheaded by S¸heyla GenÁsoy, president of Fort Lauderdale's
Turkish American Business, Education and Cultural Development Committee
and supported by donations from Turkish Americans as well as through donations
from the Kenan Evren Foundation.
Kenan Evren,
former president of Turkey and the program's namesake, Gen. Alexander
Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and other dignitaries joined FAU
President Anthony Catanese and Turkish Culture Minister Istemihan Talay
in announcing the Kenan Evren Eminent Scholar Chair in Turkish Studies.
U.S. former
Secretary of State and former commander of NATO European Allied Forces
Alexander Haig, Democrat Party Florida Congressman Robert Wexler who is
the chairman of the Turkish Friendship Group at the U.S. Congress, and
Turkish Ambassador to the United States Faruk Logoglu also attended the
ceremony.
The Kenan
Evren Eminent Scholar Chair was established with $600,000 in private donations
and an anticipated $400,000 state grant. Evren, president of Turkey from
1983 to 1989, is credited with strengthening political and economic ties
between Turkey and the United States. Through a $1 million endowment,
FAU will sponsor economic research and hold conferences for those interested
in economic relations between Turkey and the United States, and particularly
relations with Florida. But it was clear that those who spoke want to
strengthen more than business ties between the countries.
"This is
a nation that is playing an increasingly important role on the world stage,
as demonstrated most recently by Vice President Cheney's pledge of $228
million to enable Turkey to assume command of the international peacekeeping
force in Afghanistan," said Catanese.
Haig said
a lack of knowledge about Turkey has resulted in bad U.S. decisions regarding
the country, such as a 1970s embargo. The U.S. relationship with Turkey
has never been as important as it is now, Haig said. "It is the anchor
of stability in Central Asia and the Middle East, in a world of confusion,"
he said.
Speaking
through a translator, Evren joked that his nation's strategic geography
comes with a price.
"I sometimes
feel jealous of countries like the U.S. and Great Britain that have two
neighbors," he said. "When you have two neighbors, you have two problems.
When you have eight neighbors, you have eight problems."
Evren soon
became serious.
"I don't
want to name any names right now, but we have neighbors who would love
to export their religious beliefs," Evren said.
Turkey's
citizens are mostly Muslims, but the democratic government is secular.
Evren stressed differences between the religious beliefs of the majority
of Turkey's citizens and the followers of Osama bin Laden. Evren's hopes
Turkish students who study at FAU will "show that we are not like those
fundamentalists."
S¸heyla GenÁsoy,
president of Fort Lauderdale's Turkish American Business, Education and
Cultural Development Committee, said bin Laden and others like him try
to influence poor Turkish young people by paying for an education that
stresses extremist beliefs.
That is why
her organization hopes to establish a scholarship program to send poor
Turkish students to FAU.
If more
Americans learn about Turkey, she said she will consider the new FAU program
a success.
|
|
Denktas
says Montenegro deal a model for Cyprus
NICOSIA, March 26 (Reuters) -
Turkish Cypriot leader Rauf Denktas said on Tuesday a recent European
Union-backed deal for a new union between Montenegro and Serbia
offered a model for the divided island of Cyprus. Earlier this month
Montenegrin and Serbian leaders agreed to revamp the state into
a loose union and name it Serbia and Montenegro. Either side can
opt out after three years.
EU
foreign policy chief Javier Solana had pushed hard to get the two
sides to agree, fearing Montenegrin leaders' plans for independence
could trigger fresh turmoil elsewhere in the volatile Balkans.
"The
Montenegro model, this is an example that is close to our desires
-- recognising each other and creating a unity," Denktas told reporters
after meeting Greek Cypriot President Glafcos Clerides on Tuesday.
Cyprus
has been effectively partitioned since Turkey [intervened] in 1974
in response to an Athens-backed Greek Cypriot coup. Only Ankara
recognizes the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
Denktas
and Clerides started a fresh round of U.N.-backed face-to-face talks
in January. The talks have been given added urgency as the internationally
recognized government of [Greek] Cyprus in the south edges closer
to finalizing its EU membership, expected to happen in 2004 or 2005.
Greek
Cypriots want a single federated state made up of two regions, while
Turkish Cypriots want a union of two states only loosely linked
by a central administration.
Turkish
Observer Killed in Westbank, Another Wounded
The
Turkish Times with wire services-Two observers from an
international force in Hebron, a Turk and a Swiss, were shot and
killed on March 26 when Palestinians opened fire on their car in
the West Bank on Tuesday, the Israeli military said. One of those
killed was Turkish Major Cengiz Toytunc. Another Turkish observer,
Captain Huseyin Ozarslan, was wounded in the same attack. Ozarslan
is recuperating at GATA military hospital in Ankara. Major Toytunc's
body is sent to his city Antalya for funeral arrangements.
The
observers, serving in the Temporary International Presence in Hebron,
were driving on a bypass road used mostly by Jewish settlers when
their car came under fire near Halhoul, a West Bank town north of
Hebron. There was no immediate comment from the peace force. The
two were the first members of the force to be killed in the West
Bank.
In
a letter sent to Turkish Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit on March 27,
American Jewish Committee leaders expressed their condolences for
the death of the officers who were "attacked without provocation
by members of the Palestinian Authority security services."
"As
Captain Ozaslan told Israel Radio yesterday, he clearly saw the
attacker who wore the fatigues of the Palestinian Authority's security
forces and carried an AK-47 assault rifle. He said, "We shouted
that we are observers, members of TIPH...but he did not hear us
and continued to shoot." Turkey's decision to participate in the
TIPH is evidence of your nation's importance as a beacon of democratic
stability in a troubled region. And, once again, Turkey has shown
itself to be a staunch ally and friend in our joint struggle to
counter the forces that bring terror to civilian populations," said
ATC officials Harold Tanner and David A. Harris.
Palestinian
Authority denies
Palestinian Authority's Ambassador to Ankara Fuat Yasin rejected
the assertion that the Turkish officers were assaulted by Palestinians.
When he was reminded Captain Ozarslan's testimony that they were
attacked by armed men wearing Palestinian uniforms, Yasin replied
that the Israeli Army has special units wearing Palestinian uniforms
and claimed that the bullets used in the incident matched those
used by the Israeli army. In a written press statement, the Palestinian
Authority claimed that the international observers were attacked
by Israeli gunmen shooting from El Falah and El Cubari apartment
complexes.
The
force, made up of unarmed observers from Scandinavian and European
countries, was set up under a 1997 agreement dividing Hebron into
Palestinian- and Israeli-controlled zones.
The
city was divided because about 450 Israeli settlers live in three
enclaves in the center of the city, among some 130,000 Palestinians.
The observers, recognizable by their clearly marked white cars,
make periodic reports about violations of the truce. Settlers charge
that the observers are biased against them, while Palestinians say
that the settlers, among the most militant in the West Bank, constantly
harass the local Palestinians.
Turkey
was among the first countries in the world that recognized PLO as
a legitimate entity and agreed Yasser Arafat to open a representation
bureau in Ankara.
For
more news on this story in Turkish, try: www.ntv.com.tr/
news/143129.asp
Slipshod
Human Rights Grades
U.S. Human Rights report on Turkey is distressingly emblematic
Bruce
Fein, News Analysis-Human rights are too important to
be left to amateurs. Yet the United States State Department's annual
human rights report brims with amateurism. Uncorroborated reports
from anonymous sources are routinely equated with proven facts.
Isolated abuses are conflated with the chronic. And private human
rights crimes are deemed tantamount to government misconduct.
These
glaring deficiencies make the State Department's country-by-country
report card substantially worthless. There are no incentives or
accolades for human rights progress enshrined in institutional and
cultural changes. The grading reads like a droopy bureaucratic exercise,
thus forfeiting the moral suasion and utility it could command if
professionalism prevailed in the preparation.
The
lengthy and tendentious 33 page 2001 human rights report on Turkey,
(released on March 4, 2002), is distressingly emblematic. All of
its faults cannot be examined in a column as a concession to the
shortness of life and attention spans. But a sample should be sufficient.
Under
the sinister banner of "Arbitrary of Unlawful Deprivation of Life,"
the report pejoratively maintains: "There were credible reports
of extrajudicial killings by government agents; however, accurate
figures were unavailable." But that indictment of the Turkish government
wars with itself. If the reports were credible, then accurate figures
would be a matter of simple addition. In any event, nothing is proffered
to prove the complaints to the State Department were credible, as
opposed to the delusions or exaggerations of government opponents.
And in ordinary courts of law, a conclusory statement that an anonymous
source was credible enjoys no evidentiary standing.
The
State Department continues: "According to the Human Rights Foundation
and press reports, there were 9 reports of deaths of detainees,
and 21 persons killed by police or Jandarma, allegedly for not heeding
'stop warnings' or for resisting arrest." But nothing is said of
whether HRF and press reports have proven reliable in the past,
whether investigations were undertaken to substantiate the reports,
or, if so, what was unearthed. Note also the naked anti-government
bias in the State Department's declaration. The government's law
enforcement justifications for killings are scoffed at as "allegations,"
whereas the accusers' allegations are tacitly treated as credible
findings. Moreover, the report is silent as to the incidence of
detainee deaths or police killings in Turkey as compared to the
United States or sister countries whose human rights records are
the gold standard. Similarly, nothing is said of the relative prevalence
of suspected police or prison abuses, for example, whether 9 detainee
deaths make up a micro-fraction or a serious fraction of all detainees.
Furthermore,
the State Department fails to address whether these asserted human
rights violations were sponsored or championed by the Government
of Turkey, or whether the alleged crimes were individual aberrations.
If the latter were true, the government would not be culpable as
a human rights wrongdoer. Indeed, the Department concedes that Turkish
courts investigated most alleged extrajudicial killings, indicative
of government condemnation of the same. Its report frets, however,
that "the number of arrests and prosecutions in such cases remained
low compared with the number of incidents, and convictions remained
rare." But the reader is clueless as to the Department's benchmark
for determining its "low" characterization. In the United States,
for example, the percentage of police brutality allegations that
ripen into administrative, civil, or criminal sanctions is tiny.
Policemen are reluctant to testify against their own. Think of the
exoneration of the New York City police for the death of suspected
drug abuser Amadou Diallo, an incident in which the police shot
the immigrant a staggering 41 times. The report deplores that convictions
were "rare." But that should earn a salute if the reason were lack
of incriminating evidence. Stalinist show trials or kangaroo courts
are not human rights trophies.
The
State Department insinuates, however, that the Turkish government
conspires to thwart prosecutions and punishment for the most grievous
of human rights crimes perpetrated by security forces: "Punishments,
when handed down, generally were minimal; monetary fines have not
kept pace with the high rate of inflation; and sentences were frequently
suspended. Jurisdictional questions, efforts by the police leadership
to protect officers, prosecutors' failure to investigate and bring
charges, and the failure of the courts to hand down appropriate
sentences were all obstacles to resolving the apparent impunity
of security forces for such deaths."
But
how can a punishment be condemned as lenient without presentation
of all the circumstances of a crime, both aggravating and mitigating?
And if the Government of Turkey wished to give its security forces
free reign to prey on the population, why would prosecutions be
initiated at all?
The
State Department also denounces "honor" killings in Turkey and trafficking
in women and children. But the Government of Turkey is equally revolted
and horrified. And private crimes are not government human rights
violations. For instance, the United States was not held responsible
under human rights law for the unspeakable crimes of Timothy McVeigh
or the Unibomber. In sum, the State Department's 2001 human rights
report on Turkey smacks more of character assassination than a serious,
fair-minded, and meticulous appraisal of the state of human rights
in the country, including consideration of the threats it confronts
from separatist and religious terrorism and religious extremist
meddling by Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Turkey
admittedly sports human rights shortcomings. But everything in life
is a matter of degree, not absolutes. And few would deny that the
human rights culture in Turkey has made a spectacular leap forward
over the past decade, and that its popular and institutional feet
continue to stride in a positive direction. This should be acknowledged
and applauded by the State Department to fortify Turkey's human
rights voices and vanguards. The Department's report, in contrast,
is substantially earmarked by uninformed or distorted sticks and
no plaudits. Aren't the chief unwitting beneficiaries Turkey's enemies,
not its human rights reformers?
|

|