
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat walks with Greek Minister for Foreign
Affairs George Papandreou, left, and Turkey's Foreign minister Ismail
Cem, right, after their meeting at Arafat's office in the West Bank
town of Ramallah Thursday April 25, 2002. |
Turkish
and Greek foreign ministers meet Arafat
Dina
Kyriakidou, JERUSALEM, April 25 (Reuters)
- Greek and Turkish foreign ministers, on a groundbreaking Middle East
peace mission, urged Israelis and Palestinians on Thursday to follow the
example of the former historical foes and patch up their differences.
George Papandreou
of Greece and Ismail Cem of Turkey told reporters after meeting Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Palestinian President Yasser Arafat that
they had urged the Palestinian leader to denounce terrorism.
Papandreou
said it was in the interests of all sides to "get beyond the cynicism
and get down to the building of peace, real peace," citing the example
of reconciled former foes Turkey and Greece as a source of hope for the
troubled Middle East.
Historically
bitter enemies, European Union and NATO member Greece and Turkey, NATO's
eastern pillar, nearly went to war as recently as 1996.
"In our discussion
with President Arafat we suggested it was the moment where all of us,
all Palestinians... should come up with a strong condemnation of terrorism
and the use of terror as a means of struggle," Cem said. The ministers
said they had addressed several "volatile issues," including Israel's
besieging Arafat for months at his office in Ramallah and a stalemate
between Israeli troops and gunmen at one of Christianity's holiest sites
in Bethlehem.
Papandreou
said he and Cem had "added some positive ideas and proposals that... could
provide a good basis for moving ahead." Cem alluded to their "input" regarding
Bethlehem, and elaborated in a later joint interview from Tel Aviv on
CNN.
"We were
able, it seems, to have an understanding on who will leave or will be
sent out -- what will be the conditions of those people within the church,
for them to go away," he said.
Nine youths,
as well as two corpses, emerged from the church under guard on Thursday
as the standoff between Palestinian gunmen inside and Israeli troops continued.
The youths
were given medical treatment and were expected to be allowed to go, the
army said.
Of the 230
people in the church, dozens are clergy and other civilians.
PEACE
CORPS
Cem also raised the idea of establishing a "peace corps" in the region.
Papandreou
and Cem were the latest of a few foreign officials whom Israel has allowed
to visit Arafat since its tanks pushed into his compound on March 29,
when it launched an offensive after a wave of Palestinian attacks in a
19-month-old uprising against occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The other
dignitaries were U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell and envoy Anthony
Zinni, EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana and the foreign ministers
of Egypt and Jordan.
Israeli Foreign
Minister Shimon Peres, who met Papandreou and Cem in Tel Aviv, thanked
them at a news conference for setting their national differences aside
to pursue peace in the Middle East. "Forgetting everything else, you come
here. It is a symbol of hope and a message of peace," Peres said.
Turkey has
close military and diplomatic relations with Israel, but, as an overwhelmingly
Muslim state, supports Palestinian aspirations to independence.
Greece also
has long-time sympathy for the Palestinians, given its traditional inclination
as a small state to support an underdog, periodic tensions with Israel's
main ally, the United States, and concern about Israeli ties with Turkey.
Papandreou said he believed that "a secure Israel means a secure Palestinian
state, a viable Palestinian state."
Arafat is
a hero to the ruling Greek Socialist Party, which invited him as the main
speaker to its congress last year. Papandreou's late father, former premier
Andreas Papandreou, was a close friend of the Palestinian leader.
Ankara
Documents 518,000 Turks Killed by Armenians
Sadullah
Özcan, Zaman (Turkey)
- April 19, 2002, Ankara-A special research team formed at Turkish Prime
Ministry has concluded its study of the Turks killed by Armenian paramilitary
troops and brigands during the World War One years. According to the results
of the study, 518,105 Turks and Azeris have been killed by the Armenians
during the last years of the moribund Ottoman Empire, and the years of
Turkish War of National Liberation that followed. The results are compiled
from 89 documents, which relied on archives in Azerbaijan as well, and
published in 2 volumes.
Turkish government
commissioned such a historical research as a reaction to April 24 being
declared by the Armenian lobby as the anniversary of the so-called "Armenian
genocide."
Most of the
research was carried out in the Ottoman archives in Istanbul, State Archives
in Ankara and Baku. In Azeri archives a number of reliable documents were
found regarding the Turks murdered by the Armenians during WW1. Some of
these documents are currently exhibited at Turkish Prime Ministry State
Archives General Directorate, in Ankara.
In the first
volume, there is detailed information on how 363,141 Turks and Azeris
were martyred, including the specific way in which they were killed and
the location of their murder. The second volume provides similar detailed
information on the murder of 154,964 Turks and Azeris. The worst loss
of life, as narrated in Volume Two, took place in Nakchevan in 1920, when
64,408 people were killed due to hunger, illness, cold and Armenian attacks
on unarmed civilians. In armed attacks that took place during that year
in Nakhchevan, 5,307 people were murdered by the Armenians.
The Armenian
lobby, which claims that 1.5 million Armenians were killed by the Ottoman
Turks as a result of an official decision to commit genocide, never address
the undeniable murders committed by the Armenian troops and brigands helping
the Russian armies invade Eastern Turkey, and joining the French troops
invading southern Turkey. Turks admit that hundreds of thousands were
killed on both sides as a result of the civil-war conditions that reigned
during the WW1 years -- but not as a result of a policy of genocide.
Example:
Document #38
Some of detailed information contained in Document #38, one of the 89
documents detailing the Turkish losses, is as follows:
September
1919: 3 people killed during attacks and looting in Allahuekber.
September 1919: 12 Turks died under torture in Unye, BlacSea.
February 10, 1920: 100 Turks died in Cildir when mowed down by machine
guns.
February 28, 1920: 40 Turks died as a result of an attack on the captured
Turkish soldiers in Pozanti, Adana.
March 9, 1920: 120 died in Zarusat when attacked by bayonets and axes.
March 22, 1930: 2,000 Turks died in Suregel and Zarusat.
May 5, 1920: 774 Turks died in Kars as a result of torture, armed attack
and bomb explosions.
July 2, 1920: 408 died in Kars and Erzurum in ambushes.
July 2, 1920: 500 drown in Zengibasar when they are caught while fleeing
and thrown into the water.
August 1920: 650 massacred in Oltu.
October 15, 1920: 1,387 killed in 99 villages of Bayburt.
October 17, 1920: 9,287 killed in 30 villages of Pasinler.
October 19, 1920: 8,439 murdered in various neighborhoods of Erzurum.
October 26, 1920: 10,693 die under torture in various locations in the
vicinity of Kars.
December 7, 1920: 14,620 killed in the various villages of Kars, Digor.
December 14, 1920: 5,337 killed in the 18 villages of Sarikamis.
1920: Almost 70,000 murdered in Nakchevan villages.
1921: 600 killed in the 24 villages of Karakilise.
November 12, 1921: 1,215 killed in ambushes on the 39 villages of Erzurum.
President
Bush to Armenians:
"Transcend this venomous pattern"
"Demonizing others lays foundation for a dark cycle
of hatred"
The
Turkish Times - President George W. Bush, in a message he has
sent to the Armenian-American community on the occasion on April 24 (which
is observed by some Armenian-Americans to commemorate the "Armenian genocide")
not only did not characterize the civil-war struggle between the Ottoman-Turks
and Ottoman-Armenians as a "genocide," but he also implied that it is
time for the Armenians to transcend "this venomous pattern."
For years
the Armenian lobby have been trying very hard to have a U.S. President
officially utter the "G-word." France passed a law declaring that events
of 1915-23 were a "genocide." Britain, however, last year officially declared
that the events were not a "genocide" at all.
"It is a
day for recognizing that demonizing others lays foundation for a dark
cycle of hatred," President Bush reminded the Armenians. "Transcending
this venomous pattern requires painful introspection about the past and
wise determination to forge for a new future based on truth and reconciliation.
In this spirit, I look forward to Turkey's restoring economic, political
and cultural links with Armenia."
Although
President Bush invited the Armenians to a "painful introspection about
the past," the Armenian lobby refuses to discuss anything about the past
since they claim that their own version of Ottoman-Armenian history is
beyond any discussion or critical review.
Armenia currently
occupies 25% of the territory of Republic of Azerbaijan. Over 1 million
Azeris became refugees in their own land when the Armenian forces invaded
Nagorno-Karabakh and unilaterally declared it an "independent republic."
That's why Turkey is not restoring full diplomatic relations with Armenia,
as requested by President Bush.
Despite his
diplomatic approach to a sensitive historic controversy, President Bush
still disappointed some Turkish-Americans by failing to mention the millions
of Turks and Azeris killed by the Armenian rebels in their attempt to
stab the Ottoman army in the back and open a path for the invading Russian
and French forces. Turkish Prime Ministry has recently documented 518,105
of such Turkish and Azeri victims. Turkish-Americans are baffled in the
face of such silence regarding the well-documented Turkish and Azeri casualties
suffered in the hands of Armenian troops.
The Armenian
lobby has for long pursued a strategy of having their claims officially
recognized as "genocide" by the White House and the U.S. Congress. Once
such a recognition is secured, the Armenian lobby will press forward with
"reparation" payments from the current Turkish Government which did not
even exist during when Ottoman-Armenians have joined the occupying Russians
in the East and French in the South to seal the fate of the "Sick Man
of Europe." The third and last step of the Armenian strategy is to ask
for territorial concessions from Turkey. They are hoping to accomplish
by political fiat and legislation what they could not achieve by use of
arms in 1915-23.
(The
full text of the message.)
Turkey
officially agrees to take over ISAF command
Number of Turkish troops in Afghanistan to increase
to 1,000
Turkish
News, Ankara, April 30 - The Turkish cabinet officially agreed
to take over command of the peacekeeping mission in Afghanistan for six
months after Great Britain.
After a two-hour
meeting of the Turkish cabinet, the Prime Ministry issued a written announcement
that Ankara would increase the number of its troops in the International
Security Assistance Force (ISAF).
It gave no
specific date for Turkey to take over the command, except to indicate
that there will be negotiations with the countries that are presently
participate in the force and the United Nations to agree on a date.
U.S. Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld sent a letter to Prime Minister Bülent
Ecevit, and not to his Turkish counte part Sabahattin Çakmakoglu,
assuring Turkey of full U.S. support if it assumes command, private NTV
television reported.
Ankara announced
its intention 'in principle' to take over the command of the force following
strong pressure from the United States and Great Britain.
Earlier this
month, British officials said they did not believe that a hand over would
take place before June, the Associated Press reported.
Ankara said
that it would increase the number of soldiers in the force, which is responsible
for patrolling Kabul and its surrounding areas. Ankara indicated in the
past that the number may increase to 1,000.
But the Turkish
government is extremely reluctant to expand the mandate of the force,
although Afghan leaders have been calling for a larger force that patrols
other areas of the country that are under control of regional war lords.
The Turkish
announcement said that the area of responsibility for the force will not
change. Turkey has objected to plans to double the number of peace keepers
and their deployment them outside of Kabul for fear that the force would
become entangled in local disputes.
Ankara's
concerns that the command may prove to be an Page 12 additional financial
burden to its crisis-struck economy was largely calmed by promises of
U.S. aid. Turkey also insisted that the United States provide cargo planes
and that Great Britain leave behind some of the facilities it set up for
the peace keepers but private NTV said that the British were reluctant
to go along with this idea.
Turkey has
participated in past NATO peacekeeping missions, including Kosovo and
Bosnia. A Turkish commander [(Ret.) Gen. Cevik Bir] headed the peacekeeping
mission in Somalia, but Turkey did not contribute a significant number
of ground troops as part of that mission.
Osman
"Oz" Bengur is Running for U.S. Congress
The
Turkish Times - Osman "Oz" Bengur, a successful Turkish-American
banker from Baltimore, Maryland has decided to run for U.S. Congress as
a Democrat candidate from 2nd Congressional District. Bengur, who us referred
to as a "dark horse candidate" by Maryland media, is campaign on a wide
platform that includes many issues ranging from education to homeland
security.
Bengur
is challenging C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger for the Democratic nomination
in a congressional district drawn by the Maryland governor P. Glendening
specifically with the term-limited Baltimore County executive in mind.
Ruppersberger has won all five elections he's entered during the past
17 years, while Bengur's only campaign was to be an alternate delegate
to the 1980 Democratic National Convention from Maine. Bengur won.
Baltimore
Sun on Bengur
Andrew A. Green of Baltimore Sun described Bengur as follows: "Oz Bengur
insists that he knows what he's doing... He last worked in government
in 1983, his opponent has a milelong political resume, and he doesn't
yet live in the 2nd Congressional District, but Oz Bengur is no flake.
He's got money, he's got a big-name campaign consultant, and he intends
to win.
"For some
politicians, it's a game of musical chairs. There's not enough chairs,
so what do you do?" Bengur says. "This has got to be more than musical
chairs and finding a spot for a guy to continue his political career."
Bengur, 53,
is an investment banker who wears Ferragamo ties and has a tendency to
quote from The New Yorker. He runs nearly every day and finished a 5K
last year in a respectable 25 minutes.
He owns a
house in Ruxton, but now that legislative maps are finalized, he's planning
to move to the 2nd District, which stretches from Randallstown around
to Timonium, over through the east side of Baltimore County, around to
southern Baltimore City and Anne Arundel County and up to Havre de Grace.
Bengur filed
for the seat last month and is planning a campaign around the topics of
increasing health care access, improving education and fighting urban
sprawl.
To combat
Ruppersberger's name recognition, Bengur says he plans to run a vigorous
race (he's taken a leave of absence from work to campaign full time) and
get his name out at every opportunity. That, and raise a lot of money.
According
to a campaign finance report filed last week, Bengur has $297,000 in his
campaign treasury.
Ruppersberger
reported nearly $1.6 million in a November finance report, but all of
that money was raised when he was plotting a run for governor, meaning
very little of it can be transferred directly to a federal campaign account.
Almost all
of Bengur's money - $290,000 - came from his pocket, but he says he plans
to hold a number of fund-raisers in the next two months. He said he expects
that between his business contacts and fellow members of Princeton University's
Class of 1971, he'll be able to raise enough for the advertising he'll
need to be competitive.
"I think
it will get people's attention," Bengur says. "It shows we're serious
out here."
Another attention-getter
is Bengur's campaign consultant: Julius Henson, a bare-knuckled city politico
known for take-no-prisoners campaigns.
As a consultant
for Lawrence A. Bell III in Bell's 1999 mayoral campaign, Henson organized
the disruption of a rally at which prominent city politicians endorsed
candidate Martin O'Malley. Henson brought 50 chanting, placard-waving
Bell supporters to War Memorial Plaza, drowning out some of the endorsements.
Last fall,
city state's attorney candidate Warren A. Brown dropped out of the race
after Henson, campaign manager for candidate Lisa Joi Stancil, dug up
details about Brown's private life. In private, Bengur's friends question
the decision to hire Henson. Bengur says he was aware that the consultant
had a checkered reputation, but that when they sat down to discuss the
race, Henson laid out step by step how he could win the election. "It
was very impressive," Bengur says.
Bengur was
born in Montgomery County, lived overseas for several years and then went
to high school in Washington. While an English major at Princeton, he
says, he was inspired by the notion that government could improve people's
lives.
Aside from
a stint at Cambridge University in England, where he earned a graduate
degree in criminology, Bengur spent a dozen years after college working
for state governments in New England, first in juvenile justice and later
in energy policy.
Bengur says
he became interested in business, and out of a desire to try something
new and make a good living for his family, took a job with Alex. Brown
& Sons Inc. and moved to Baltimore.
In 1991,
he and Charles Bryan, a fellow Alex. Brown alum, founded an investment
firm, Bengur Bryan & Co., which works with clients that are too small
for traditional investment banks. Through it all, Bengur talked about
getting into politics, Bryan says.
"It's something
he's always wanted to do, and he feels like he's got a shot at it with
the open seat," Bryan says. "He'll be an excellent congressman. He's very
intelligent, very caring and a very thoughtful person." (Who
is Oz Bengur?)
|
|
ATAA
Thanks Grossman for Fighting PKK Terrorism. PKK
is included in EU list of Terrorist Organizations
The Turkish Times - ATAA President
Dr. Orhan Kaymakcalan has sent a letter of appreciation to U.S.
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Marc Grossman on
the occasion of European Union's decision to include PKK in its
list of "terrorist organizations." PKK has recently changed its
name to KADEK in an effort to disassociate itself from its bloody
past. However, U.S. State Department said there is no difference
between KADEK and PKK. EU sources said DHKP-C, another Marxist terror
organization of Turkish origin, may also be included soon in the
same list.
In
his April 30 letter to Secretary Grossman, Dr. Kaymakcalan said
"it was reported recently in the media, that the European Union
(EU) has finally decided to add the PKK to the list of international
terrorist organizations. This decision will bring the EU list one
step closer to the list by the State Department that has rightly
and consistently listed the PKK for many years."
"We
know that the State Department has played a leading role in explaining
to our European allies the importance of a worldwide consistent
effort to combat terrorism.
In
particular, we are grateful for the support given by the United
States to Turkey in it's fight against various terrorist organizations
and especially PKK terrorism. We know that the decision by the EU
to list the PKK is in no small part due to the efforts by the United
States to this effect. We are also aware that the U.S. has made
similar efforts to have the DHKP/C included in the EU terrorist
organizations' list as well. We hope that this notorious organization
that also targeted many American interests, will soon be included
in the EU's list, as well."
"On
behalf of the Assembly of Turkish American Associations, I take
this opportunity to express our deep gratitude to the Secretary
and to you for your leadership in an issue that is very important
to our community and to the Turkish people," Kaymakcalan concluded.
Amb.
Grossman: "Turkey Should Be Part of E.S.D.P.". Amb. Ziyal:
"Turkey favors expansion of NATO "
ANKARA (A.A), April 16 - U.S.
Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Marc Grossman said
on Tuesday that a solution must be found between Turkey and EU about
European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP), adding that "Turkey
must be a part of ESDP."
Grossman
met with Ugur Ziyal, the Foreign Ministry Undersecretary the same
day.
Responding
to questions of journalists together with Grossman, Ugur Ziyal said
that they consulted with Grossman about NATO.
"Our
consultation carries importance as it is prior to the NATO Summit
in Prague and foreign ministers meeting in Iceland," said Ziyal
and noted that they focused on three main issues in the meeting.
"One
of them is NATO's developing new capacities against new tactics
following the September 11 terrorist attacks. We took up NATO expansion,
NATO's relation with Russia and NATO's strengthening its relations
with other countries within the scope of peace for partnership.
Turkey and the U.S. share the opinion that NATO will also be one
of the main pillars of security and stability in the coming century,"
Ziyal said.
INS
Institutes New Security Checks
Cigdem
Acar, Special to The Turkish Times, April 24, 2002 -
We have been informed by the INS that all pending and future petitions
and applications, except naturalization applications, are being
subjected to a new security check. It is not quite clear to what
degree this process is expected to delay adjudications. The premium
processing program will not be delayed by these new security checks
unless there is a security "hit." We will keep you informed as more
information becomes available.
INS'den
aldigimiz yeni bir habere göre halen islemde olan ve ileride
yapilacak olan tüm basvurular (vatandaslik basvurulari hariç)
yeni bir güvenlik kontrolünden geçirilecek. Bu
yeni güvenlik kontrolünün basvuru degerlendirmelerini
ne kadar aksatacagi henüz açik degil. Önemli bir
güvenlik engeline takilmadikça Öncelikli Islem
(Premium Processing) programi aksamayacak. Gelismelerden sizi haberdar
etmeye devam edecegiz.
|
TURKISH
TORQUE...
Short Takes & Media Notes
By Ugur Akinci, The Turkish Times
turkishtorque@aol.com
|
|
Muslims
and Democracy
April 28, 2002 - A new study carried out at Harvards John
F. Kennedy School of Government introduces a new twist to the now-famous
"Clash of Civilizations" thesis first introduced a decade
ago again by another Harvard professor, Samuel P. Huntington. The
main result of this important study "Islam & the West:
Testing the Clash of Civilizations Thesis," by Pippa Norris
and Ronald Inglehart is that Muslims "[do not] hate democracy
and reject Western political values," as summarized by
Washington Posts Richard Morin (April 28, 2002).
The
survey asked eight questions to 100,000 participants between 1995
and 2001 in 75 countries in order measure attitudes towards democracy
and democratic ideals, including whether they approved of "having
experts, not government, make decisions," and whether they
thought it would be better to have a "strong leader who does
not have to bother with parliament and elections." The participants
were also asked various questions on social and cultural issues,
"including attitudes toward divorce, homosexuality and abortion,"
as Morin summarizes. One major and glaring shortcoming of the study
is that nobody from such staunchly Islamic countries as Saudi Arabia
were interviewed.
Morin
concludes that "many of the Muslims surveyed in nine predominantly
Islamic countries are huge fans of democracy and may even
be lightly more gung-ho about democratic values than citizens of
Western countries..."
The
authors Norris and Inglehart say that "the primary cultural
fault line between the West and Islam, [concerns] the social issues
of gender equality and sexual liberalization [my emphasis].
The values separating Islam and the West revolve far more centrally
around Eros than Demos."
I think
this study ignores the importance of "secularization"
to this discussion. I believe with Bernard Lewis (The Multiple
Identities of the Middle East, Shocken Books, 1998) that the separation
of "church and state" is germane to Christian teaching
(i.e. "Render unto Ceasar the things which are Ceasars
and unto God the things which are Gods").
Islam,
on the other hand, has never recognized such a separation. Prophet
Mohammed "as a ruler promulgated laws, dispensed justice, commanded
armies, made war, made peace, collected taxes, and did all the other
things that a ruler does" (Lewis, ibid, p.27).
Thus
a Muslim may indeed yearn for multi-party elections and discussing
issues in Parliamentary debates but does this necessarily mean that
he or she also wants a secular order?
Iran,
for example, does have elections and a Parliament where lively debates
are rule of the day. But is Iran really secular? Or, is "Shurah"
one and the same thing as a "Parliament"?
It
is interesting that the Muslim participants of the study differ
significantly (the authors talk about a "fault line")
from their Western counterparts in "gender equality and sexual
liberalization." Those are precisely some of the hot-button
issues that secular regimes allow develop towards more "equality"
and "liberalization." In most Muslim countries, the very
same developments create a deep sense of "humiliation"
(observe the political furor over headscarf issue in Turkey) because
it negates the political control that Islamic establishment tries
to maintain on the society, whether it is democratic (e.g. elections,
multi-parties, etc.) or not.
If
the authors failed to measure the Muslim attitudes towards secularization
then they have really failed to zero in on the real structural "fault
line" that divides Islamic and Non-Islamic countries. Attitudes
toward "gender equality and sexual liberalization" are
just derivatives of the attitudes towards secularization.
"Compromise"
between "conflicting interests" (including class- and
special-group-interests) is at the heart of Western secularism.
"The prime test in Islam," on the other hand, "is
communal loyalty and conformity... The Muslims [place a] great stress
on consensus, both as a source of guidance and as a basis of legitimacy"
(Lewis, ibid., p. 31).
If
the findings of this Harvard study is true, even greater (and not
lesser) tensions are ahead for the Islamic countries because
the more the individual Muslims yearn for Western-style political
democratization, the more will be the strain between secularization
(which is the backbone of any Western
democracy) and the main teachings of Islam.
Secular
Turks, as well as pro-Islamic Turks, are all fully aware of this
inherent incompatibility between Islam and secularization (if not
formal democracy).
Secular
Turks try to cope with the dilemma by adopting one of the three
responses:
1)
They become non-practicing nominal Muslims. They insist that
Islam is a "personal choice," just like Buddhism or Christianity
presumably are.
2)
They adopt a positivist-agnostic attitude, and, in extreme cases,
become outright atheists.
3)
They continue to be sincere and practicing Muslims, how ever,
by making a public display of their allegiance to Islamic symbols
and values in an effort to find a middle-of-the-road working-compromise
between themselves and the proponents of the "authentic,
pristine" Islam. Mehmet Ali Bayar, for example, Turkeys
new hope on the center-conservative-right, is one such secular
Turk trying to bring about a reform-with- out-Reformation,
hoping to avoid altogether the theoretical dilemma lurking
in the heart of the matter.
I believe
that none of these responses are adequate to bridge the gap between
Islam and secularization in Turkey. This burning question will continue
to be on the forefront of Turkeys
participation in the globalization process.
|

Dress
with Class and Help ATAA Raise Funds!
ATAA
is proud present the distinctive designer necktie created by Los Angeles-based
Turkish painter Metin Bereketli:
This
one-of-a-kind 100% Italian silk designer tie, carrying Bereketlis
signature, is created after Sept 11 and is dedicated to peace and
harmony among the nations of the world.
Buy
a Peace Tie today and shine proudly with a distinctive message
of peace every time you wear it, while helping ATAA bring more membership
programs to the Turkish-American community.
Half
of the purchase price of $50 will be donated to ATAA. Ties will
be shipped within one week.
Please
send today a check for $50, made to "ATAA," with your
mailing address to:
PEACE
TIE
Attn: ATAA
1526
18th Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20036
Or you
can also call in today to order your Peace Tie with Credit Card payment:
(202) 483-9090. |

|